It was recently announced that Ball State hired Ron Oliver as their director of basketball operations.
http://www.thestarpress.com/article/201 ... TS/7150346The article discusses the heavy interest in the position and the fact that Oliver's resume includes a two year stint as an NBA assistant coach with the Detroit Pistons.
Around the MAC, the DBO position is filled with an eclectic mixture of people: young former GA's from major programs, former JUCO coaches, AAU coaches and even an ex-Division I head coach (Dan Peters at Akron). CMU and Miami recently promoted their DBO's to fill vacant positions on their coaching staff. The one common thread is that all are current, former or aspiring basketball coaches.
BG, on the other hand, is the lone exception. Orr has taken a different approach with our position, hiring someone specifically with no ties to basketball or coaching. There was an article in the Sentinel-Tribune about this, and he basically said that this was done on purpose because aspiring/former coaches have little desire to handle the adminisrative requirments of the position and he'd rather have someone who focuses exclusively on this role with no illusions of getting involved in the on-court functions.
So what do you think? Is is wise to take this approach with the position? (From all accounts, she does an excellent job with the scheduling/administrative matters). Even if we wanted to, does the low pay preclude us from going after a guy with an NBA background like the guy at Ball State? Are we losing the experience/connections that are provided by a coaching-type person in this role like every other program in the conference has? I can see both sides and am not quite sure which is best for BG basketball.